• Share. Be Supported. Recover.

    We are a friendly, safe community supporting each other's mental health. We are open 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.

Welfare reform: chuck the nutter in the gutter



Well-known member
Aug 12, 2008
Southend on sea
Welfare reform: chuck the nutter in the gutter

by Laurie Penny
January 4, 2009 at 6:30 pm

The tendency not to want to believe in mental illness festers across the Western world, and particularly in Britain, the nation that gave us Shakespeare, concentration camps and the stiff upper lip. From the friends and families of sufferers to the upper echelons of government, the suspicion that mental health difficulties are forms of weakness – simple personality flaws that could be eradicated if more of these mentalists would jolly well buck up – informs policy and influences behaviour. We need to look this institutional prejudice in the face and call it what it is: outdated, destructive and desperately unhelpful.

In the face of what appear to be across-the-board rises in cases of serious depression, anxiety and other debilitating disorders, the response of our government in boom times has been to quietly shunt the sick onto a government poverty package and tell us to be grateful. However, as incapacity levels continue to rise, the DWP’s new Work to Welfare policy threatens to shunt us just as quickly back to the jobcentre, telling us that we’re scroungers who were actually making it up all along. This comes in the teeth of a recession. Nice timing, Purnell.

Many of the 40% of Britain’s 2 million IB claimants who are unable to work due to mental health difficulties already have a few problems with paranoia. But, as the noted social theorist Kurt Cobain observed, that doesn’t necessarily mean that they’re not after you. Because when any major political party talks about moving people off Incapacity Benefit, when they talk about instituting a system of interviews to ‘weed out’ benefit ‘scroungers’, we know that they’re talking about the mentally ill – those whose disabilities and challenges are most difficult to see and to quantify, often the poorest and most vulnerable members of society who have since Thatcher’s day been the first in the firing like when budget cuts needed to be made.

Mental illness is perhaps the subtlest and most frightening of all forms of social difference, because of its invisibility, because of the difficulty in quantifying it, and because it is not a binary condition: you’re not simply mad or sane, there’s a whole spectrum in play. But the hatred and fear that the mentally ill face on a daily basis, the lack of understanding shown to them by the welfare state and criminal justice system, and the fact that they are perpetually the first targets of punitive budget cuts, adds up to a sum of institutional bias which belongs in a previous century.

Employment law is one big area where the Disability Discrimination Act has so far failed to translate into action when it comes to the mentally ill. The argument goes something like this: it’s more risky and more costly for company x to hire person y if they suffer from a mental illness – after all, how is company x to know that that employee y won’t fall behind on their work, start slicing themselves up by the water-cooler or march into the office one day spraying slugs of hot lead death into co-workers and clients? Simple ignorance is the first obstacle to greater understanding here: in fact, the mentally ill are statistically less likely to perpetrate violent crime, and far more likely to become victims of it. But a subtler prejudice against minorities is inherent to the hypercapitalist machine – because yes, it is technically less costly for a firm to hire an individual who is entirely mentally well. By the same logic, it is also better business sense to hire someone who is neither physically disabled nor a female of childbearing age. Yes, these people represent a financial risk to the company; no, this doesn’t mean that discrimination is a logical and acceptable consequence of that risk. What happens when companies are allowed to set their own hiring policies purely on the basis of business sense is that a large amount of the nation’s talent remains untapped, and swathes of people who need to be in work more than almost anybody become dependent on the state. Individuals suffer, and the entire economic community suffers. Anti-discrimination legislation and hiring standards are not only essential for the advancement of true equality; they advance free nations both spirituality and economically.

It is not enough for the Ministry of Plenty Department for Work and Pensions to demand that mentally ill recipients of incapacity benefit find themselves a job in an employment market which was highly suspicious of them in the boom times and which is now rapidly contracting. What we need if we are to avert a genuine crisis both in employment and in public health is a radical restructuring of what it means to be a worker in the information age. It is also not enough just to whinge about current policy without suggesting viable alternatives.So, what would a world with fewer stigmas against the mentally ill look like?

It would be a world in which employers and businesses recognise that mental disability, like physical disability, does make it more of a challenge for an employee to carry out a job of work – and that those challenges can be surmounted with understanding and reasonable adjustments Fifty years ago, the idea of having ramps on public transport, in offices and public buildings in order to help the physically disabled participate in normal life would have sounded preposterous and wildly costly – now it is more or less accepted that the physically disabled have just as much drive to work and live as the rest of us, and should be aided in that goal. The same attitude needs to be applied across the board.

It would be a world in which flexible and part-time working is not only available but a respected and well-taken up practice required of all employers, in order to help the mentally disabled, the physically incapacitated and those with caring duties, including parents, to stay in appropriate work. It would be a world in which part-time work is supported by government benefits, allowing the hundreds of thousands of people with mental health difficulties who cannot cope with full-time work to participate more fully in the economic and cultural life of the nation.

It would be a world in which the many laudable grants, higher education places, work schemes and training projects set aside specifically for the physically disabled and other minorities are matched by similar schemes for the mentally and emotionally disadvantaged.

This is about socialism, but it isn’t just about socialism. It’s about creating a world that is fairer and more efficient, carrying every citizen with it. If the government really wants to leave no one behind – if it wants to move more of the mentally ill into rewarding, taxpaying work, rather than simply pare more fat from the already scrawny welfare state – we need to dare to dream of a society in which everyone can participate.


And with that, I’m going to go and exercise another of my dysfunctional coping mechanisms and have a little cigarette. I’d offer, but you wouldn’t want one. It’s fucking menthol *cackle*.


Yes very good - I re-posted the article on the Rethink Forum.




They'll have to make bigger gutters

With the credit crunch, unemployment, debt and misery - more people will become ' Mentally Disordered '.
Similar threads
Thread starter Title Forum Replies Date
cpuusage Black Triangle Campaign UK Government Welfare Reform Deaths October 2015 Work, Money, Benefits, Housing and Education 6
cpuusage UK Welfare Reform Deaths ~ Updated List ~ October 21st 2014 Work, Money, Benefits, Housing and Education 10
deedle141 Welfare reform >:( Work, Money, Benefits, Housing and Education 1
Artmuzz Unhappy with welfare rights officer Work, Money, Benefits, Housing and Education 6
Artmuzz Welfare benefits when sharing flat with friend Work, Money, Benefits, Housing and Education 10
W Welfare:Written statement - HCWS414 Work, Money, Benefits, Housing and Education 1
ScaredCat Volunteering can be bad for mental health without the right welfare support Work, Money, Benefits, Housing and Education 6
cpuusage Working welfare: a radically new approach to sickness and disability benefits Work, Money, Benefits, Housing and Education 12
cpuusage Disabled researchers book exposes corporate demolition of welfare state Work, Money, Benefits, Housing and Education 3
H How will the welfare cuts affect you if you are in the Work-Related Activity Group (WRAG)? Work, Money, Benefits, Housing and Education 66
cpuusage Never mind destitution – how many people are DEAD after dropping from welfare system? Work, Money, Benefits, Housing and Education 3
cpuusage UN Launches Second Investigation Into Impact Of Tory Welfare Cuts Work, Money, Benefits, Housing and Education 2
cpuusage Coalition’s welfare scheme at risk of wasting billions, warns watchdog Work, Money, Benefits, Housing and Education 11
cpuusage The welfare rights adviser on a mission to shame Iain Duncan Smith Work, Money, Benefits, Housing and Education 2
Weasel Welfar reform - legal aid cuts Work, Money, Benefits, Housing and Education 3
U Social Housing Reform Work, Money, Benefits, Housing and Education 4
U Social Housing Reform Work, Money, Benefits, Housing and Education 1

Similar threads