• Welcome! It’s great to see you. Our forum members are people, maybe like yourself, who experience mental health difficulties or who have had them at some point in their life.

    If you'd like to talk with people who know what it's like

Do You Believe in Magic?

A

Apotheosis

Guest
: Eckhart Tolle, the Dalai Lama, and the Future of Psychotherapy

http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...tolle-the-dalai-lama-and-the-future-psychothe

There can be no denying that former depressive philosophy student Eckhart Tolle is a phenomenon: his books The Power of Now and A New Earth sold millions of copies and are perceived by his readers to be profoundly spiritual. One of Tolle's main points is apparently his emphasis on the present moment, and our subjective experience of our existence in that "spacious" moment.

This focus on the "here and now" sounds very familiar to humanistic or existential psychotherapists, having been employed by pioneering practitioners like Otto Rank, C.G. Jung, Carl Rogers, Rollo May, Fritz Perls, J.F.T. Bugental and many others long before Tolle began writing. Buddhism, especially Zen Buddhism, and Taoism influenced existential psychotherapy, placing particular importance on conscious awareness and acceptance of what is in the moment. Tolle takes these perennial, basic Buddhist principles of meditation and popularizes them for the masses. But what does the ravenous hunger for such rehashed and repackaged spiritual wisdom say about the times in which we live? And about the present and future of psychotherapy?

One place I disagree with Tolle regards his proclamation that the sort of enlightened consciousness he promotes is the "new consciousness." In fact, it is very old, as old as humanity itself. And, it is not, as Tolle suggests, part of an inevitable evolution of perfected human consciousness moving inexorably toward this transcendental state of being. This is pure New Age jibberish and naivete. Meditation has been practiced around the world for millennia, and this samadhi has has always been the purpose of such spiritual practices. The notion of God in religions of every kind is an acknowledgment and surrender to something bigger than and beyond the individual ego. Psychiatrist C.G. Jung called this something the Self. The Self in Jung's psychology can be likened to our solar system's Sun, around which the much smaller Earth (or ego) revolves. In contrast to Freud, the Self, for Jung, not the ego, is (or needs to become) the center of the personality, in the same way that the Sun is the center of the solar system. But I am not at all convinced that this ego-transcending state of mind touted by Tolle is more prevalent today than ever before in history. Indeed, I would argue that precisely the opposite is true: Humanity is becoming more, not less, ego-centered and narcissistic. We are, no doubt, at a critical juncture in the evolution of consciousness. But the responsibility for attaining this consciousness remains with the individual. Each person must work independently toward his or her own salvation and enlightenment. In this case, a rising collective tide does not necessarily float all boats. Still, a widespread increase in consciousness could help stem the swelling tsunami of anger, rage, violence and evil around the world--something psychotherapy still has the potentiality to help accomplish. But not in its current condition.

The field of psychotherapy is in profound crisis.(See my prior post.) Psychotherapy today is failing to address the psychospiritual needs of the public to whom it professes to minister. As a result, the public is seeking to satisfy their spiritual needs elsewhere. Some turn to New Age "gurus" like Deepak Chopra and Eckhart Tolle, looking for magical, esoteric solutions to their problems. Others turn to exorcists, cult leaders or psychics for assistance. But unfortunately, there are no magic solutions to life. The development of consciousness requires commitment, sacrifice, patience and painful struggle. It also necessitates a good deal of disillusionment: a radical acceptance and coming to terms with reality, not as we think it is or as it should be, but rather as it truly is. (See my previous posts on reality.) Psychologically, people project tremendous power onto such public spiritual or religious figures, imbuing them with superhuman qualities and supreme wisdom. In existential psychotherapy, such projection is spoken of as seeking the "ultimate rescuer." Someone who will help us escape the sometimes unpleasant existential facts of life, especially death. But there is no one who can rescue us from reality, much as we wish it were so.

In depth psychology, we call this type of projection onto the person of the therapist or analyst transference. This type of transferential projection is quite common in psychotherapy of all kinds: the patient projects all sorts of healing abilities, arcane knowledge and spiritual powers onto the psychotherapist. Far more than he or she actually possesses. Initially, this unconscious projection of power onto the therapist can, indeed, facilitate the healing process. Faith is powerful medicine. As is the "placebo effect." But eventually the patient must learn that the psychotherapist (or guru) is just a person (however well-educated, insightful or spiritually wise) who struggles with reality, just like the rest of us. Even spiritual teachers, priests, rabbis, gurus and psychotherapists still have flaws, insecurities, neuroses and bad habits. Perfection is a myth. But we so want to believe in magical powers to save us from ordinary reality, and the hard work and humility required to fully accept rather than avoid it. (See my prior post on avoidance and addiction.)

This is something the Dalai Lama, who deliberately refers to himself as a "humble Buddhist monk," seems to understand very well. In a recent televised interview with Larry King, King inquired about "His Holiness' " health. The Dalai Lama, now 75, recounted that a number of years ago he had become ill, and had to undergo surgery to remove his gall bladder. He happily pointed out that despite his followers' believing he possesses suprahuman healing powers, he was unable to heal himself of this disease. And wryly insisted that this should convince his followers that he certainly does not, in fact, have divine healing powers. (See also his candid 2000 talk with King and Deepak Chopra.) Ultimately, this is what a good guru, spiritual leader or therapist must do: teach the student, disciple, patient or client what one can; help them to rediscover and develop their own power while relinquishing childish projections of supernatural power, parental authority and perfection; and send them on their way out into the world (hopefully a little bit stronger and wiser) to wrestle with life and reality on his or her own. Just like we all must do. There is, in the final analysis, no magic power, person, practice, potion or pill that can do this for us. The only real "magic" (synchronicity being one manifestation) resides in responsibly, courageously, creatively, consciously and mindfully embracing the transformative power of both inner and outer reality.
 
A

Apotheosis

Guest
There is, in the final analysis, no magic power, person, practice, potion or pill that can do this for us. The only real "magic" (synchronicity being one manifestation) resides in responsibly, courageously, creatively, consciously and mindfully embracing the transformative power of both inner and outer reality.
How very true.
 
A

Apotheosis

Guest
[YOUTUBE]<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/96kwILL35ig&hl=en_GB&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/96kwILL35ig&hl=en_GB&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>[/YOUTUBE]​
 
A

Apotheosis

Guest
[YOUTUBE]<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gfgcedLIRRo&hl=en_GB&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gfgcedLIRRo&hl=en_GB&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>[/YOUTUBE]​
 
R

rasselas

Guest
Thanks for this, Apotheosis. It's very interesting.

I couldn't get over the first sentence initially...

There can be no denying that former depressive philosophy student Eckhart Tolle is a phenomenon
FRIEND: What's wrong, Tolle?
PHILSOPHER TOLLE: Someone has retrospectively prefixed 'depressive' to my status as a philosopher.
FRIEND: Now why would they do that? No one ever says former depressive prime minister Winston Churchill. Or former schizophrenic mathematician John Nash.
PHILSOPHER TOLLE: Yes they do. But I have noticed two things. The first is that I am prefixed by this writer as 'philosopher' whereas you are not prefixed at all. In fact your entire identity is constructed in relation to me.
FRIEND: No! That's just not equable! And what's the second observation?
PHILOSOPHER TOLLE: It is this. No one is ever identified with positive signifiers relating to their positive mental health. For instance, it is never written former consistently emotioned baker; or former largely contented Judge. The spotless mind is assumed. It is not necessary to dwell on it.
FRIEND: I'm not willing to use that term spotless mind, but even without it surely the reason it is assumed is because the majority of people don't suffer troubling phenomena or mental anguish?
PHILOSOPHER TOLLE: I'm not convinced of that. The sages all say that life is suffering. Who is not anguished? Who is not troubled by phenomena?
PARANOID FRIEND: They should change my name to paranoid friend.
DEPRESSIVE PHILOSOPHER TOLLE: It's depressing, as you may have a point.

:)
 
Last edited:
R

rasselas

Guest
...

This part you picked out here which says that, "there is, in the final analysis, no magic power, person, practice, potion or pill that can do this for us. The only real "magic" (synchronicity being one manifestation) resides in responsibly, courageously, creatively, consciously and mindfully embracing the transformative power of both inner and outer reality." I agree with too.

Though not absolutely. Because there's this tendency, there's this very American-influenced tendency to revert always to individualism, the self as entirely autonomous to socio-economic conditions, other selves, the environment, history, the media etc. But then, they did suffer McCarthyism and the taboos reinforced by that process are now deep within the north american consciosuness.

This I liked too:

"Faith is powerful medicine. As is the "placebo effect." But eventually the patient must learn that the psychotherapist (or guru) is just a person (however well-educated, insightful or spiritually wise) who struggles with reality, just like the rest of us. Even spiritual teachers, priests, rabbis, gurus and psychotherapists still have flaws, insecurities, neuroses and bad habits. Perfection is a myth. But we so want to believe in magical powers to save us from ordinary reality, and the hard work and humility required to fully accept rather than avoid it. (See my prior post on avoidance and addiction.)"

Or critique it, critique Capitalism, Globalisation, Corporatism, Individualism... Again, this is very much pushing the idea that you should stoically accept the status quo and fix yourself!

:)

But it's true that there are no magic bullets. To shoot a magic bullet you would need a magic gun. And they are some way off their magic guns (although not through want of trying!).

:)
 
A

Apotheosis

Guest
Good points Mark; Yes, I agree.

Though not absolutely. Because there's this tendency, there's this very American-influenced tendency to revert always to individualism, the self as entirely autonomous to socio-economic conditions, other selves, the environment, history, the media etc.
This is true.
 
Top